OVERRULED

When you put forward a claim there are those who will always claim the opposite in order to prove that they have seen both sides of the story and in your assertion that you may have missed something of importance. This is done not only because they believe that they are making a point that you haven't yet considered but also they want to highlight how open minded they are compared to you. They confidently believe that you have  jumped to conclusions rashly without logical thought even though you've made your claims with all things considered which is why your focus is now only on the importance of what should take presidence. When decisions have to be made we like to consider everyones preferences but where opinions crossover we have to make the choice to satisfy the many and at the same time try to accommodate the best we can for the minority. If we decided to do the opposite to what seems to be the most rational choice to satisfy the most people you can in your power because they are more flexible and more willing to compromise  whereas the minority are more likely to be focused on only their own way of being and are less likely to try to adapt with the consensus because it doesn't fit their specific needs. The choice should be an easy one if you don't turn it into an emotional one because emotions will keep you thinking that you can please everyone but logical thought understands you can't. People are sometimes driven by their irrational emotions which can go against what is logical and steer others into the wrong direction this puts your focus on the individual who isn't in control of their emotions rather than the clear thought process you have when you are in your right mind. So before you make any claim make sure that you can stand by it before it is overruled with a simple comment otherwise you will be left to choose to backtrack anything you may have said that made you second guess your claim.